Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Eldon Stricker Karen Lynn Stricker, and Saul Irving Brooks, AKA Edward C. Watson, AKA Charles Trobut, AKA Martin A. Carter, AKA Wayne Bruce, AKA David Williams Agusta Brooks, Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Eldon Stricker, AKA Keith Brighton, AKA Charlie Drier, and D/B/A Circle S Investments, Metropolitan Management & Development Co., R.B.S. Industries, Cheinco Products, Metacom and Pms Co. Karen Lynn Stricker, AKA Carol Dixon, AKA Ellen C. Warson, and D/b/a/ Circle S Investments, Metropolitan Management & Development Co., R.B.S. Industries, Chenico Products, Metacom and Pms Co. Jeanette Deutsch

Good Law
28 F.3d 105·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199493-55045California736 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Eldon STRICKER; Karen Lynn Stricker, Defendants, and Saul Irving Brooks, aka Edward C. Watson, aka Charles Trobut, aka Martin A. Carter, aka Wayne Bruce, aka David Williams; Agusta Brooks, Defendants-Appellants. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Eldon STRICKER, aka Keith Brighton, aka Charlie Drier, and d/b/a Circle S Investments, Metropolitan Management & Development Co., R.B.S. Industries, Cheinco Products, Metacom and PMS Co.; Karen Lynn Stricker, aka Carol Dixon, aka Ellen C. Warson, and d/b/a/ Circle S Investments, Metropolitan Management & Development Co., R.B.S. Industries, Chenico Products, Metacom and PMS Co.; Jeanette Deutsch, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-55045, 93-55812. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 1994. Decided May 23, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, and FLETCHER, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.