Demuth v. Cirrus Capital Corp.

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter DEMUTH; Hans G. Diederichs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CIRRUS CAPITAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation; Pegasus Capital Corporation, a California Corporation; George E. Batchelor, Gregory Harding-Brown, Richard W. Doust, Defendants- Appellees. No. 93-15031. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 16, 1994. * Decided June 24, 1994. Before: Goodwin, Pregerson, and Rymer, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter Demuth ("Demuth") and Hans Diederichs ("Diederichs") appeal the district court's grant of an unopposed Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion, in their diversity action alleging that defendants improperly deprived them of commissions for their brokerage services pursuant to an aircraft leasing agreement. Demuth and Diederichs also appeal the district court's denial of their motion to alter or amend the judgment, to grant them relief from the judgment, and to file a third amended…