Rosalee Evans v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
28 F.3d 105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 199493-16060California1,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosalee EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16060. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 28, 1994. As amended Oct. 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosalee Evans, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in her Bivens 1 action alleging prison officials violated the Eighth Amendment because they failed to adequately protect her from the threat of serious injury from another inmate. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether the district court correctly applied the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.