Emmons v. County of Orange

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard H. EMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; Joint Marshals Personnel Committee for the County of Orange; Marshal Department of the County of Orange; Michael S. Corona; James L. Hill; Don Spears; Gary G. Tackett; Michael Padore, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-56365. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1994. Decided June 27, 1994. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard H. Emmons has standing to pursue his overbreadth claims. He claims that the Marshal's Department's regulations are unconstitutional as applied to him and threaten the First Amendment rights of all the department's employees. Ripplinger v. Collins, 868 F.2d 1043, 1047 (9th Cir.1989); NAACP v. City of Richmond, 743 F.2d 1346 , 1352, 1358 (9th Cir.1984). 3 Because the challenged regulations are overbroad, the district court properly struck them down.…