Juanita W. Childs v. Paine Webber, Inc.

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Juanita W. CHILDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAINE WEBBER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16337. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 28, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Juanita Childs appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action based on res judicata. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co., 967 F.2d 1280, 1287 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from relitigating all issues that were or could have been raised in that action. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1988). 4 Childs's present action arises from the same asserted injury and involves the same party as her previous federal action…