Bobby A. Davis v. S.R. Campbell

Good Law
28 F.3d 105·1994 WL 287601·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25354
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 199493-17040California1,011 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bobby A. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.R. CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17040. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 28, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bobby A. Davis, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal after remand of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action on res judicata grounds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 This court reviews de novo a district court's dismissal on res judicata grounds. Palomar Mobilehome Park Ass'n v. City of San Marcos, 989 F.2d 362, 363 (9th Cir.1993). We may affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record. United States v. Washington, 969 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom, Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington, 113 S.Ct. 1945 (1993). 4 The allegations in Davis's complaint stem…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.