Edward Glaser v. City of Bell Gardens Bell Gardens Police Department Los Angeles County Sharon McCall Valerie Earley

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward GLASER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BELL GARDENS; Bell Gardens Police Department; Los Angeles County; Sharon McCall; Valerie Earley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Glaser appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging civil rights violations against various defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 As an initial matter, we reject the defendants' argument challenging our jurisdiction over this appeal. Our review of the status conference proceedings and the district court's order clearly indicates that the court intended to dismiss the entire action without extending the time for service of process. Therefore, we consider the order final…