Rosalee Evans v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correction Institution, Pleasanton, Physicians Assistance Staff, and M. Jackson, Counselor

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosalee EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; Federal Correction Institution, Pleasanton, Physicians Assistance Staff, and M. Jackson, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 28, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosalee Evans, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in Evans's Bivens 1 action alleging that defendants were deliberately indifferent to her serious medical needs by (1) assigning her to nonsedentary work contrary to a prison doctor's recommendation, and (2) preventing her from obtaining an ankle brace for her arthritis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Standard of Review 4 We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Kruso v.…