Domingo v. Allen

Good Law
28 F.3d 105·1994 WL 259384·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25341
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199493-15835California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Myrlin DOMINGO, ** as personal representative of the estate of Ramon Domingo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles ALLEN; United States Postal Service; United States of America; Shirley Joyo; the Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15835. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided June 13, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Ramon Domingo appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants United States Postal Service, Pacific Insurance Limited, and Shirley Joyo. Domingo argues that the grant of summary judgment to the Postal Service was error in that his acceptance of a payment for property damage from the Service did not constitute a waiver of later claims under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2672 . He also argues that the grant of summary judgment to defendants Pacific and Joyo was error because he did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.