Robert Brigaerts v. Sheriff Cardoza San Mateo City Board of Supervisors

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BRIGAERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheriff CARDOZA; San Mateo City Board of Supervisors, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15706. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Brigaerts, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of officials of the San Mateo County Jail in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Brigaerts alleged that jail officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs and to constitutionally inadequate conditions of confinement that prevailed while he was detained at the San Mateo County Jail. 1 He contends the district court erred by granting summary judgment because (1) material facts were in dispute, and (2) the court had not previously ruled on his requests for assistance with discovery and for…