Linda Clark v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Good Law
28 F.3d 105·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25334
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199492-55603California693 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Linda CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55603. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1994. * Decided May 23, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 We do not consider the reports of Dr. Thorton and Dr. Mishra since they are not part of the administrative record. Clark has not appealed the district court's denial of her motion for remand based on new evidence. The record now before us supports the Secretary's decision that Clark is not disabled and can return to her previous work. 4 The record supports the Secretary's finding that Clark's left hand function did not warrant a restriction precluding jobs requiring bilateral manual dexterity. See Fife v. Heckler, 767 F.2d 1427, 1430 (9th Cir.1985). Dr. Ayers reported Clark had wrist pain but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.