F. Farah Etemad v. State of California, Department of Toxic Substances Control Kathy Darling Jose Kou

28 F.3d 105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. F. Farah ETEMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL; Kathy Darling; Jose Kou, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56508. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 21, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 F. Farah Etemad appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of her action against the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") and two of its employees alleging various claims arising from her discharge from employment. Etemad also appeals the district court's sanction of $750 against her. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On February 10, 1992, Etemad filed a pro se complaint against DTSC alleging various claims arising out of her discharge from employment. After granting two opportunities to amend the…