Gushi Brothers Company Chuji G. Chutaro Beverly L. Chutaro, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Bank of Guam, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GUSHI BROTHERS COMPANY; Chuji G. Chutaro; Beverly L. Chutaro, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. BANK OF GUAM, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 93-16137. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1994. Decided July 7, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gushi Brothers ("the Chutaros") challenge the district court's grant of the Bank of Guam's ("Bank") post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law as to their claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy. They contest the court's conclusion on the merits and contend that the court erred in allowing the Bank to amend its answer to plead limitations as a defense. The Chutaros also challenge the court's grant of a directed verdict as to their claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, contending that the court improperly excluded…