Edward J. Kosla v. Stanford University Hospital, Steven R. Dear and Alonzo C. Maxwell

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward J. KOSLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Steven R. Dear and Alonzo C. Maxwell, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 20, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward J. Kosla appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration following the dismissal of his action against Stanford University Hospital and two individuals (collectively "Stanford"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 We review for an abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a motion for reconsideration. Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1441 (9th Cir.1991). 4 Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) allows a court to relieve a party from a final judgment "only upon a showing of (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered…