In Re William Lee Hausler, Debtor. William Lee Hausler Ernel McCloskey Conservator of the Estate of William Lee Hausler v. Heidi Wagner Lilliane Dausse, Kathleen Jane Hobrow Louis Hesson East Bay Area Tumor Institute Heart Lung Institute of the East Bay George T. Brady, of the Estate of A. Berens Nelson

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re William Lee HAUSLER, Debtor. William Lee HAUSLER; Ernel McCloskey, Conservator of the estate of William Lee Hausler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Heidi WAGNER; Lilliane Dausse, Kathleen Jane Hobrow; Louis Hesson; East Bay Area Tumor Institute; Heart Lung Institute of the East Bay; George T. Brady, Executor of the estate of A. Berens Nelson, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-17096. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 17, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: HUG, SCHROEDER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Lee Hausler appeals the denial of his motion for relief from a stipulated judgment. We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 A court may relieve a party from a judgment under certain circumstances. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Bankr.R. 9024. In the bankruptcy court, the only reasons asserted for Rule 60(b) relief were that Hausler did not understand what he was doing when he stipulated…