Hill

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Charles Edward HILL, Debtor. Charles Edward HILL, Appellant, v. William LITTLE; Minnie Brown; Kip Cyprus; 2974 Properties, Inc.; Community Thrift & Loan; California Newspaper Service Bureau; Southern California Foreclosure Services, Appellees. No. 92-56358. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 23, 1994. * Decided June 8, 1994. Before: BROWNING, BOOCHEVER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Hill appeals the decisions of the United States Bankruptcy Court and the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. He argues that both courts erred when they irrebuttably presumed that Hill received reasonably equivalent value for his property, sold at a noncollusive, nonfraudulent foreclosure sale, and thus found that the sale was not a fraudulent transfer. We affirm. 3 Hill's argument is based almost entirely on his assertion that our decision in In re BFP, 974 F.2d 1144…