In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of John P. Connelly. Dennis Connelly, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA OF John P. CONNELLY. Dennis CONNELLY, Intervenor-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellant. Nos. 94-55197, 94-55619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1994. Decided June 20, 1994. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dennis Connelly, the target of a grand jury investigation, appeals the district court's order requiring his attorney, John Connelly, to produce documents pursuant to a grand jury subpoena. We have jurisdiction under the Perlman doctrine. See United States v. Perlman, 247 U.S. 7, 12-13 (1918); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Lahodny), 695 F.2d 363, 365 (9th Cir.1982). We review de novo whether the documents are protected by the attorney-client privilege because the issue is a mixed question of law and fact. In re Grand Jury Investigation (The Corporation), 974 F.2d 1068,…