Edward Kuball v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
28 F.3d 106·1994 WL 362534·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 199491-56230California927 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward KUBALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1994. Decided July 13, 1994. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Edward Kuball appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Trans World Airlines ("TWA") in which the district court upheld the arbitration award handed down by the Pilot's System Board of Adjustment ("the Board"). We affirm. 3 * We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). Judicial review of Adjustment Board decisions, however, is "among the narrowest known to the law." Union Pacific R.R. v. Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 91 (1978); English v. Burlington Northern R.R. Co., 18 F.3d 741, 743 (9th Cir.1994). The Supreme Court has held that courts can…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.