In re Judkins

28 F.3d 106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Emma Ruth JUDKINS, a/k/a Emma Ruth Saddi, Debtor. Emma Ruth JUDKINS, a/k/a Emma Ruth Saddi, Appellant, v. Mohsan ALI; Amrita Ali; Judali Corporation; F.C. Adams, Trustee, Appellees. No. 93-56292. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 10, 1994. MEMORANDUM ** Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 Emma R. Judkins appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") decision, dismissing her appeal from one bankruptcy court order as untimely and affirming another order lifting the automatic stay "for cause" pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362 (d)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1293 , and we affirm. 2 * Motion to Withdraw Trustee's Report of No Assets 3 Judkins contends the BAP erred by dismissing, as untimely, her appeal from the bankruptcy court's order granting the trustee's motion to withdraw its "report of no assets." This…