Clairen M. Paine v. Joan G. Ruffennach

28 F.3d 107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clairen M. PAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joan G. RUFFENNACH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16765. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 8, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clairen M. Paine, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing nine out of ten defendants he named in his civil rights action, and staying his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) claim. Paine alleges that the defendants violated his rights under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985 , 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 and Bivens by: (a) conspiring to prosecute him under a defective indictment; (b) subjecting him to double jeopardy; (c) violating his due process rights; (d) subjecting him to cruel and unusual punishment; and (e) wrongfully withholding his mail. We have jurisdiction under 28…