National Ins. Services v. Health Practice Management, Inc.

Good Law
28 F.3d 107·1994 WL 202292·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25397
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199493-55097California1,396 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NATIONAL INSURANCE SERVICES, a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. HEALTH PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC., a California corporation; A. Leon Herrick, an individual, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants, v. PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Counterdefendant-Appellee. No. 93-55097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1994. Decided May 23, 1994. Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. Son/Grandson 2 This appeal stands or falls largely on the answer to a single question: Is a "grandson" a "son" for purposes of the Ben-E-Med insurance policy? We conclude that the two terms are not synonymous. 3 A recent Ninth Circuit decision is closely analogous. In Evans v. Safeco Life Ins. Co., 916 F.2d 1437 (9th Cir.1990), we rejected an attempt to read "children" as including "stepchildren" by expressly declaring that "[t]he meaning of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.