Mark S. Nelson v. John Ignacio John Chambers, Lt., Roger Jacobs William Valentine

Good Law
28 F.3d 107·1994 WL 247121·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25403
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 199493-16187California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark S. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John IGNACIO; John Chambers, Lt., Roger Jacobs; William Valentine, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16187. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 8, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Nelson, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Nelson contends that the defendant prison officials are denying him access to the courts by restricting the amount of free photocopying he may have to a limit of $100.00 indebtedness. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1) to review the denial of Nelson's motion for a preliminary injunction. 1 We affirm. 3 A district court's order regarding preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review. Senate of California v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.