Sean Mossman v. Transamerica Insurance Company

28 F.3d 107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sean MOSSMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1994. * Decided May 20, 1994. Before: CHOY, FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sean Mossman appeals the district court's granting of summary judgment for Transamerica. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 and 636(c)(3). We affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. O'Melveny & Meyers, 969 F.2d 744, 747 (9th Cir.1992), cert. granted, 114 S.Ct. 543 (1993). I. 4 Mossman argues that the…