Ruffino v. North Slope Borough

28 F.3d 108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roy RUFFINO; Rick Swanson; Jeff Deutsch; Marlin "Duke" Circle; Michael Donovan; Andrew Jr. Tooyak; Daniel R. Nelson; Michael McCarthy; Hanns Swiss; Lynne Athmann; Ronald W. Earwood; James Lomer; Jerry McFarland; Samuel David Real; Tim Routen; Robert Krogseng and Dan Shirey, on behalf of themselves and all other employees of the North Slope Borough similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36866. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1994. * Decided May 23, 1994. Before: TANG, BOOCHEVER, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants are former or current law enforcement officers employed in remote Alaskan villages by the North Slope Borough Department of Public Safety ("the Borough"). The officers brought an action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 201-219 (1988), for overtime…