Lee S. Robinson v. City of Hamilton

28 F.3d 108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lee S. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35161. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. 1 Before: WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, EZRA, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Robinson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her Title VII (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e) action against the City of Hamilton, Montana, alleging sex discrimination and harassment. She argues that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing her action with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C), because of her failure to respond fully to the City's discovery requests. We affirm. 4 The defendant first served Robinson with discovery requests on April 21, 1992. She did not respond within 30 days. On June 25, 1992, the court established the deadline for responding to outstanding discovery requests as July 1, 1992 and…