People of the Territory of Guam v. Daniel Wayne Carlisle

28 F.3d 108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PEOPLE OF the TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel Wayne CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-10295. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1994. * Decided May 20, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A jury in the District Court of Guam convicted Daniel Wayne Carlisle of two counts of robbery in the third degree. He was sentenced to two years' imprisonment on each count to be served concurrently. Concluding that hearsay testimony of one of the victims was erroneously admitted in violation of Carlisle's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, the District Court of Guam, Appellate Division, reversed Carlisle's conviction on both counts. The hearsay testimony did not affect one of the two counts. We reverse and reinstate the jury's verdict as to count one of the Superseding Indictment. 3 * The Government concedes that the trial court's…