United States v. Darawn Eugene Collins, United States of America v. Andre Tramelle Marshall

28 F.3d 108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darawn Eugene COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre Tramelle MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50606, 93-50611. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1994. * Decided July 13, 1994. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Darawn Collins and Andre Marshall challenge the district court's decision to enhance their bank robbery sentences by two levels for reckless endangerment. We affirm. * Marshall claims, first, that his actions were not egregious enough to amount to reckless endangerment, and second, that the only people he may have endangered were himself and the other defendants. We review the district court's determination that a defendant's conduct justifies a reckless endangerment enhancement under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3C1.2 for clear error. United States v.…