Abraham H. Stein v. Samuel A. Lewis

Good Law
28 F.3d 108·1994 WL 255062·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25068
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 199493-15736California800 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abraham H. STEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15736. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 10, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Abraham Stein, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants and the denial of his motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989) (summary judgment); Floyd v. Laws, 929 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1991) (motion for reconsideration). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment should be affirmed only if the evidence, read in the light…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.