United States v. Cesar Jimenez-Alatriste

Good Law
28 F.3d 109·1994 WL 283704·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 199493-50398California601 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar JIMENEZ-ALATRISTE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 1994. * Decided June 23, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Jimenez-Alatriste appeals from his conviction after a conditional guilty plea. He was sentenced to 57 months' imprisonment for being present in the United States after prior deportations in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (a), (b)(2). He argues that the district court improperly failed to suppress evidence of his identity and his immigration records, and that his sentence should have been for no more than two years. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 Jimenez-Alatriste moved the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.