United States v. Guillermo Victor Nahoe, United States of America v. Curtis Schwarz

28 F.3d 109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo Victor NAHOE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis SCHWARZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50517, 93-50520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1994. Decided July 8, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, FARRIS, * and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Guillermo Nahoe and Curtis Schwartz appeal their sentences following guilty pleas to charges of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1). We affirm. 3 * Nahoe contends that the district court erred in computing his sentence by applying a two level upward adjustment for possession of a dangerous weapon. See U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1). This court reviews for clear error a district court's finding that a weapon was possessed, within the meaning of section 2D1.1(b)(1). United States v. Stewart, 926 F.2d…