United States v. Stephen A. Hicks

28 F.3d 109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen A. HICKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 10, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephen A. Hicks appeals pro se the district court's decision affirming his conviction for traveling along the Denali National Park road without a permit, in violation of 36 C.F.R. Sec. 1.6(g)(1). Hicks was fined 200 dollars after a bench trial before a magistrate judge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On appeal, Hicks raises three issues. First, he contends that he should have not been cited because he had attempted to obtain a permit, but was denied one, even though Park officials knew he had a right of access into Denali National Park, as the representative of several people with mining claims located…