United States v. Robert Dale Davidson, United States of America v. Joachim Felgentraeger, United States of America v. Dirk Olsen Holst

28 F.3d 109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Dale DAVIDSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joachim FELGENTRAEGER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dirk Olsen HOLST, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30153, 93-30154 and 93-30155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1994. Decided May 31, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON, NORRIS, and LEAVY Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Appellants Robert Davidson, Joachim Felgentraeger, and Dirk Holst appeal their jury convictions and sentences for conspiracy and manufacture of methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 & 846. Holst also appeals his conviction for false declaration before a grand jury. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623 . 4 * We first address Davidson's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Davidson acknowledges that his ineffective assistance claim is…