United States v. Leslie William Jantzer

28 F.3d 109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leslie William JANTZER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994. Decided June 17, 1994. Before: ALARCON, NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Thomas Jantzer seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction for theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 641 and depredation of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1361 . He contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish that he had actual knowledge of the theft and destruction of government property, or that he had a subjective awareness of a high probability that (1) the true boundaries of a government timber sale had been destroyed so that additional timber could be taken; and (2) leave trees from Unit 2 were taken that did not create a hazard to the cutters and loggers. 3 The Government contends that the evidence…