United States v. Miguel Dario Ramirez, AKA El Gordo

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Dario RAMIREZ, aka El Gordo, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 21, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miguel Dario Ramirez appeals the district court's denial of both his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c) and 36 motions to correct his 151-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . Ramirez contends the district court erred by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his post-sentencing requests for an additional one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction. United States v.…