United States v. Miguel A. Zuniga-Camarena
Opinion
Opinion
28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel A. ZUNIGA-CAMARENA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10137, 93-10030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. d Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Miguel A. Zuniga-Camarena appeals his conviction following entry of a guilty plea, his 120-month sentence, and the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582 (c) motion for modification of sentence because of a favorable post-sentencing amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Zuniga-Camarena was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Zuniga-Camarena's counsel filed a request to withdraw as counsel of record and submitted a brief identifying…