United States v. Luis Alberto Terraza-Dominguez

Good Law
28 F.3d 110·1994 WL 327704·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25290
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199493-10704California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Alberto TERRAZA-DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10704. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Luis Alberto Terraza-Dominguez appeals his 60-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(1). 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Terraza-Dominguez's counsel filed a brief identifying two possible issues for review: (1) the district court erred by denying Terraza-Dominguez a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 5K2.0 based on his extraordinary acculturation in the United States, and (2) Terraza-Dominguez is entitled to specific performance of his plea agreement. 1 Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.