United States v. Jin Feng Zeng Jin Huang, A.K.A. Jin Huan Zeng

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jin Feng ZENG; Jin Huang, a.k.a. Jin Huan Zeng, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-10445, 93-10475. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 12, 1994. * Decided May 31, 1994. Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jim Feng Zeng ("Feng") and Jin Huan Zeng ("Huan") appeal their convictions for conspiring to violate and for violating 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028 (a)(2) by knowingly creating and transferring false immigration entry permits. They argue that the evidence is insufficient to prove (1) that the permits were "false identification" documents; (2) that there was an agreement in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy; (3) that Huan was not entrapped by the government to commit the crime; and (4) that Feng actually transferred a falsified entry permit. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. False Identification Documents 3 Feng and…