United States v. Charles L. Salter

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles L. SALTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-15340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 18, 1994. Decided June 23, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Salter appeals the district court's decision upholding his convictions pursuant to guilty pleas and a bench trial before a magistrate judge. He contends that his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol pursuant to 36 C.F.R. Sec. 4.23(a)(1) ("DUI conviction"), following his prior guilty plea to unsafe operation of a motor vehicle pursuant to 36 C.F.R. Sec. 4.22(b)(1) ("unsafe operation"), was obtained in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause and was not supported by sufficient evidence. Salter also argues that his convictions must be vacated because the complaint was not properly signed pursuant…