United States v. Edward F. Schmerber, Concepcion Hernandez, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward F. SCHMERBER, Defendant, Concepcion Hernandez, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant, No. 93-50780. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Concepcion Hernandez, the signatory on the bail bond of Edward F. Schmerber, appeals the district court's order declaring the bail bond forfeited and denying her motion to set aside the bond forfeiture. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 3 We have jurisdiction of appeals "from all final decisions of the district courts." 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 ; see United States v. Vaccaro, 931 F.2d 605, 606 (9th Cir.1991). An order declaring a bail bond forfeited is not a final decision until the district court enters judgment of default and refuses to remit bail under Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(e)(2) or (e)(4). Vaccaro,…