United States v. Patrick Omiak, United States of America v. Dennis Soolook

28 F.3d 110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick OMIAK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis SOOLOOK, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30337, 93-30339. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. Decided June 24, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Patrick Omiak and Dennis Soolook were tried before Magistrate Branson and found guilty of various acts of wasting walrus in violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1372 (a) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 . They appealed their convictions to the district court. The government cross-appealed Soolook's sentence. The district court affirmed both convictions and Omiak's sentence, but remanded Soolook's case for resentencing. 3 Omiak and Soolook now appeal the district court's judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291…