George Whitmore, Jr. v. J.D. Swinson, Jr.

Good Law
28 F.3d 111·1994 WL 327741·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199493-56252California1,026 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George WHITMORE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.D. SWINSON, Jr., Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-56252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 7, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Whitmore, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition. Whitmore contends the United States Parole Commission (Commission) improperly filed as a detainer an executed parole violator warrant against him in 1988, thus preventing him from serving his violator term concurrently with his current federal sentence. He also claims that (1) subsequent Commission decisions superseded the 1988 decision to file the warrant as a detainer, (2) he should receive good-time credit for his current incarceration against his violator term, and (3) the 120-month violator term ordered by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.