Saul Viveros-Rodriguez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

28 F.3d 111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Saul VIVEROS-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70940. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 8, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Saul Viveros-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding him deportable as charged and denying his application for a waiver of deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We grant the petition for review. 3 The BIA summarily dismissed the appeal because Viveros-Rodriguez's notice of appeal (form EIOR-26) failed to list the issues he intended to present to the BIA with…