Young-Hung Wu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

28 F.3d 111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Young-Hung WU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 9, 1994. * Decided June 27, 1994. 1 Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Young-Hung Wu appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigration judge's denial of his application for adjustment of status under Sec. 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1255 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a. 4 We review the BIA's factual findings regarding an alien's eligibility for adjustment of status for substantial evidence. See 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a)(4) (1988); Lee v. INS, 541 F.2d 1383, 1384-86 (9th Cir.1976). The BIA decision can be reversed only if the evidence presented by Wu was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that he satisfied the…