United States v. Oscar Ullyses-Salazar

Bad Law
28 F.3d 932·94 Daily Journal DAR 8529·1994 WL 267956·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15019·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4604
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 199493-50144California3,310 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Opinion by Chief Judge WALLACE.

Ullyses-Salazar challenges his sentence of 70 months’ imprisonment following his guilty plea to being present in the United States after a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826 (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal of the sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm.

I

Ullyses-Salazar was deported from the United States in 1989 and 1991. He had been convicted in state court of armed robbery in 1983, of unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle in 1988, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm in 1990. In 1992, he was discovered in the United States, and subsequently pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2).

Concluding Ullyses-Salazar’s armed robbery conviction was an “aggravated felony” as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43), the district court sentenced him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) which provides for a maximum 15 year sentence. An illegally returning alien that has not previously committed an aggravated felony, in contrast, is only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.