Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,984 in Re Brian Thomas Delaney, Debtor, Brian Thomas Delaney, Debtor-Appellee v. Danielle Alexander, Creditor-Appellant v. Richard E. Bleau, United States Trustee, Trustee-Appellee

Good Law
29 F.3d 516
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 199493-16217California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 516 Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,984 In re Brian Thomas DELANEY, Debtor, Brian Thomas DELANEY, Debtor-Appellee, v. Danielle ALEXANDER, Creditor-Appellant, v. Richard E. BLEAU, United States Trustee, Trustee-Appellee. No. 93-16217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 15, 1994. Peter J. Kozak, Stephen B. Gorman, Cameron Park, CA, for creditor-appellant. Michael S. McManus, Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, Sacramento, CA, for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Danielle Alexander, a creditor, appeals from the district court's dismissal of her appeal as untimely from the bankruptcy court's order authorizing the Chapter 7 trustee to abandon certain causes of action in the bankruptcy of debtor Thomas Delaney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d) and affirm. 1 2 The timeliness of a notice of appeal is a question of law which we review de novo. In re Kincaid, 917 F.2d 1162, 1164 (9th Cir.1990). 3 A "notice of appeal shall be filed with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.