Richard Blair and Clyde Robinson v. Rmc Lonestar, Confidential Management Services, and Satish H. Sheth

Good Law
29 F.3d 630·1994 WL 315636·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26020
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 199493-15189California1,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 630 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard BLAIR and Clyde Robinson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RMC LONESTAR, Confidential Management Services, and Satish H. Sheth, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1994. Decided June 28, 1994. Before: CHOY, POOLE, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard Blair and Clyde Robinson appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment on their various state law tort claims against their former employer. The district court concluded that all of their claims were preempted by Sec. 301 of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Blair and Robinson first contend that the district court erred by refusing to admit seven declarations from individuals other than Blair and Robinson submitted in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. We disagree.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.