Anthony Deneen Best v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director

Good Law
29 F.3d 630·1994 WL 316032·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26034
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199493-16744California2,580 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 630 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Deneen BEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16744. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Deneen Best, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. Background 3 Prior to entering the Arizona Department of Corrections on May 14, 1992, Best had a twenty-five year history of kidney stones. According to Best, he informed a physician's assistant at the Alhambra Reception Center that he had allergies to Morphine and Toradol. On May 26, 1992, Best was transferred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.