Christina Jay Acker v. Mary Vermeer

29 F.3d 630 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Christina Jay ACKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary VERMEER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Christina J. Acker appeals pro se the district court's judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants in her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Acker contends that the defendants violated her Constitutional rights by: (a) being deliberately indifferent to a risk of physical harm posed by another inmate; (b) denying her right to due process in a classification hearing; (c) denying her right to access to the courts; and (d) violating her right to privacy. Acker also contends that the district court erred by declining to exercise pendant jurisdiction over her state negligence claim. We have…