Dickinson v. Davis
Opinion
Opinion
29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kevin Bruce DICKINSON; John Sells, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Willie DAVIS, Supervisor, Correctional Food Service; G. Mendez, C.F.S.S., ASPC Florence; G.E. Grant, Arizona State Prison Complex Chaplain; Chaplain Butler, Institutional Chaplain, ASPC-Florence; John R. Thompson, Administrator of Pastoral Activities, Arizona Dept. of Corrections; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17258. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 25, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin Bruce Dickinson and John Sells (collectively "plaintiffs"), Arizona state prisoners, appeal pro se the district court's order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction in their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1). We affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a motion for a…