Alton Jackson Fales v. Indeterminate Sentence Review Board Kathryn Bail

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alton Jackson FALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. INDETERMINATE SENTENCE REVIEW BOARD; Kathryn BAIL, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-36178. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alton Jackson Fales, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court determined that Fales had procedurally defaulted on his claims that he was unconstitutionally denied release on parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 Fales contends that the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB) violated his rights under state law and the Due Process Clause in denying his request for parole release. The…